Categorised under:
Interventional Radiology
>
Vascular
>
IVC Filters
Did you know you can Register for FREE with this website?
Registration gives you full access to all of the features of WhichMedicalDevice. Find out more ...
WhichMedicalDevice is a FREE resource created by clinicians for clinicians.
Registration is free and gives you unlimited access to all of the content and features of this website.
Find out more...Registration is free and gives you unlimited access to all of the content and features of Which Medical Device. Find out more...
Which Medical Device is a community of clinicians sharing knowledge and experience of the devices and procedures we use on a daily basis. We ask that our members register with us so that we can maintain the unbiased and independent nature of our content. Registration is quick and free.
We do not make your details available to any third parties nor do we send unsolicited emails to our members. You can read our Privacy Policy here.
Comments
Comment by skidoc Commented May 29, 2012
Impact factor: 42
I'd agree with Stuart Lyon's review, this is a good device (but yes, I'm a Cook Medical Proctor & therefore biased.)
We've seen rather more perforation with this device than the Tulip, but I think the Celect, in general comes out easier, (if you think it's a good idea to take them out).
They do tend to lie their noses against the contralateral wall when deployed from the groin, but its straightforward to straighten them usually.
We too have used the Sos/Terumo/snare/loop/pull off label removal procedure to get them out. We've CT scanned all our filter patients after extraction & never seen any issues, but I do worry about how hard I sometimes have pulled to get them to release. (I do tend to pop in a 6f right femoral vein sheath and have a big stent graft on the shelf, when I start to sweat).
We've followed all of ours up since 2007, so 5 years, they looking pretty good. GRP
Comment by domfay Commented May 25, 2011
Impact factor: 76
User Rating
Very simple to deploy although new design hasn't solved the problem of the device tilting. It seems similar to the Tulip in terms of technical ease of removal. I've retrieved one at 6/12 without any difficulty.
Comment by wtkorn Commented Jun 25, 2008
Impact factor: 1
User Rating
We have used other retrievable filters at our community hospital. Initially I preferred the optease because femoral retrieval is so appealing but it seems to get incorporated into the wall more firmly. We were able to retrieve 10 in 12 attempts. The previous Tulip seems easier to remove to me than the Celect. I dont have the stats.
Comment by davec Commented Mar 25, 2008
Impact factor: 105
User Rating
Put in 8 of these and retrieved 6/6 successfully. Wonder what the longest time anyone has left one of these and successfully removed it is ?